Modified 10 Strategic Points Template
Article Citation
Vangilder (n.d.). Dissertation.
Point
Description
Location
(Page #)
Broad Topic Area
Physics education research (PER)
1
Lit Review
Yes
23-30
Problem Statement
It was not known how (a) thinking and reasoning with MRS occurs, and (b) how that sort of thinking and reasoning affects epistemological change in terms of mechanisms and processeswhether cognitive, behavioral, or socialin an IP classroom. Moreover, as shown in the review of the literature herein, it is not clear what anyone means by the terms thinking and reasoning within any context.
8
Research Questions
R1: How do IP students use representational systems in their thinking and reasoning?
R2: How does the use of MRS in the thinking and reasoning of IP students promote personal epistemological change?
12
Sample
Twenty-nine students comprising 2 class groups served as the study sample. The class groups consist of one algebra-based physics class group and one calculus-based physics class group.
75
Describe Phenomena (qualitative) or Define Variables/Hypotheses (quantitative)
Phenomenon of how students in an IP classroom think and reason with MRS as they experience epistemological change
77
Methodology & Design
Qualitative/phenomenological, based on grounded theory
77, 82
Purpose Statement
The purpose of this study is to determine how students in an IP classroom think and reason with MRS as they experience epistemological change.
77
Data Collection Approach
The qualitative data in the form of student journals, survey, and interviews obtained throughout the study, is punctuated by a number of traditional IE assessments of IP, and the Psycho-epistemological Profile (PEP).
77
Data Analysis Approach
Inductive
82
Evaluation...
The phenomenon under study is how students in an IP class think and reason with MRS as they experience epistemological change. It is a key component in qualitative research because it is the subject of the research. The problem identified in the study is that it was not known how thinking and reasoning with...
…will be tested in deductive research (Dobson et al., 2012). The inherent dangers in using this approach, strategic guessing, is that it relies somewhat on intuition rather than on
empirical evidence. A solution might seem like the most likely based on a limited data setbut it could be completely wrong because of
assumptions made by the researcher or because of a limited supply of information. Basing a
hypothesis on limited information and then
testing it can prove to be very time and energy intensive, and it might be more beneficial to work towards obtaining more information through inductive research than rushing into deductive research. The main assumptions behind abductive reasoning are that all the relevant data has been accumulated and that one can make a reasonable guess or hypothesis about the cause of a phenomenon based on the information possessed at the time. These assumptions can be valid or invalid depending on the actual extent to which all the necessary information…
